Home > Error Bad > Error Bad Owner/group Rpmbuild

Error Bad Owner/group Rpmbuild

Change owner your source file. Terms Privacy Security Status Help You can't perform that action at this time. I guess the rpm was originally built by user 502 on a different system, but I'm still puzzled as to why the rpm build should enforce that they are the same. I built and installed rpm from upstream at the latest commit and installed it in a CentOS 7 build environment and it worked like a charm. useful reference

rpm build error: Bad Owner/Group by Robert Helle » Fri, 05 May 2000 04:00:00 What does this error message mean: 'Bad Owner/Group'? This causes rpmbuild to throw a "Bad owner/group" error and quit without building. wxPython-users Search everywhere only in this topic Advanced Search Trouble using latest source to build RPMS Classic List Threaded ♦ ♦ Locked 2 messages Jeffrey Stephens Reply | Threaded Open this DMA transfer vs. my site

into it. into it. Changes: - in opensuse build service, do not build mysql per default - removed gconsole, as it is not supported in V5 anymore - removed the patching of src/cats/make_sqlite3_tables.in, src/cats/create_sqlite3_database.in, src/cats/make_catalog_backup.in, Screenshot instructions: Windows Mac Red Hat Linux Ubuntu Click URL instructions: Right-click on ad, choose "Copy Link", then paste here → (This may not be possible with some types of

I bought it for the fact that it comes with nice extras such as DeskJet and SB-AWE drivers and netscape.) -- "Volleyball is racquetless team ping-pong played with an inflated ball DOCBOOK errors: am I doing something wrong? 8. För att kunna använda diskussioner i Google Grupper måste du aktivera JavaScript i webbläsarinställningarna och sedan uppdatera sidan. . into it.

Things like the necessary directories and all. Dayi *know* this has come up before, and i've already skimmed what googlefound for me....Hmm.... Ghostscript translates PostScript code into many common, bitmapped formats, like those understood by your printer or screen. I changed to root and issued the > command: > > # rpm -ba wxPythonGTK.spec > > Everything went along fine for a while, and then I get the following error:

I'm assuming you are doing:rpmbuild -bp SPECS/mypackage.specand getting some sort of "Error: Bad owner/group" message.You might check your %files section. What does this mean? I took the > freedom to use a slightly different approach falling back to the user > and group of the rpmbuild process and then to "root". > > Florian > Did all the files getunpacked?Eli--------------------. "If it ain't broke now,Eli Carter \ it will be soon." -- crypto-grameli.carter(a)inet.com `-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may containconfidential and/or privileged information that is intended

Ghostscript is normally used to display PostScript files and to print PostScript files to non-PostScript printers. this page This way it works. * Thu Jul 29 1999 Michael K. Moray. "To err is human.  To purr, feline" Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula.spec Logwatch issues From: Kern Sibbald - 2010-01-26 16:38:54 On Tuesday 26 January 2010 17:12:48 Moray Henderson wrote: > Kern connected.

It takes a few tries to set it up the first > >time, but after that, it saves using root and possibly wrecking your OS or > >fiddling with chroots. > see here but i've tried variouscombinations -- i've unloaded the tarball, changed the owner and groupof the contents, and zipped it up again. And why does rpm care? Could you send me the patch as an attachment to avoid all problems with mailer wrap and such?

If you're using rpm v4, you should begin getting used to: rpmbuild --rebuild this didn't seem to make a difference... best regards, Philipp Am Freitag 29 Januar 2010 13:16:20 schrieb Moray Henderson: > >From: Kern Sibbald [mailto:[email protected]] > > > >> RPM build errors: > >> Bad owner/group: /builddir/build/SPECS/bacula.spec > >> My rpmbuild command still fails with mock-chroot> rpmbuild -D 'build_centos5 1' -D 'build_sqlite 1' -ba bacula.spec ... this page If you are not the intended recipient,you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using,copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message.FSL accepts no responsibility for loss or damage

chowning it back to root sorted that. (Talking about unnecessary complications, my build system uses mock, which is how Fedora think it should be done.) Now I'm guessing the paths through The file is readable by all... IMO it is much easier to use .rpmmacros to >work in your home directory.

this means that i have a pre-built "rpmbuild" executable thati don't have the source for at the moment, so i'm kind of limited in thatrespect.as part of the rebuild process, the

I figured that the source now wasn't in a consistent state, so I deleted the whole /usr/src/linux directory and tried to reinstall it from the Red Hat SRPMS CD. symlinked /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libbac.so.1.0.0.debug to /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libbac.so.debug symlinked /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libbacsql.so.1.0.0.debug to /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libbacsql.so.1.debug 8095 blocks + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-comment-note /usr/bin/strip /usr/bin/objdump + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars error: Bad owner/group: /builddir/build/SPECS/bacula.spec RPM build errors: Bad Also when copying from source to buildroot, you've > got the variable in the source path as well as the destination. > > Patch below should fix things. > > Moray. Slow -> halt modem 3.

If you are not theintended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this e-mailmessage is strictly prohibited. Install on 2nd HD + LILO 7. I changed to root and issued the command: # rpm -ba wxPythonGTK.spec Everything went along fine for a while, and then I get the following error: .2-buildroot http://axishost.net/error-bad/error-bad-owner-group-usr-src-redhat-specs.php If you install ghostscript, you also need to install the ghostscript-fonts package. %prep %setup -q -n gs%{version} %setup -q -T -D -a 1 -n gs%{version} # When configuring or adding new

Please don't fill out this field. J. Thanks for the tip, I tried all of this but I still can't build it: [[email protected] downloads]$ rpm --rebuild NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-2960.src.rpm Installing NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-2960.src.rpm error: Bad owner/group: /home/dave/rpm/SOURCES/NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-2960.tar.gz If I look in my chowning it back to root sorted that. (Talking about unnecessary complications, my build system uses mock, which is how Fedora think it should be done.) Now I'm guessing the paths through

If you have received this e-mailtransmission in error, please reply to the sender, so that properdelivery can be arranged, and please delete the message from yourcomputer. To purr, feline" > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation > Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best R 2004-01-19 11:46:48 UTC Panu Matilainen 2004-01-19 12:21:54 UTC about - legalese Loading... I downloaded the latest source, wxPythonSrc-2.4.0.2.tar.gz, unzipped and untarred it, cd'd to the wxPythonSrc-2.4.0.2 directory, and edited wxPythonGTK.spec changing "%define builtin_libs 1" to "%define builtin_libs 0" as suggested.

Jay > Hi! > > Fixed upstream as 916d528b0bfcb33747e81a57021e01586aa82139. It takes a few tries to set it up the first >time, but after that, it saves using root and possibly wrecking your OS or >fiddling with chroots. Follow-Ups: Re: Having problems with rpm --rebuild From: [email protected] (Kurt B. Day 2004-01-15 20:09:23 UTC Eli Carter 2004-01-16 21:01:54 UTC Ram Prakash.

NIS+ owners and groups, I am confused. 11. I tested my patched rpmbuild in environments with good uid/gid mappings and bad uid/gid mappings and it seems to build just fine in both cases. Already have an account? Name: ghostscript %define version 5.10 Version: %{version} Release: 10.epsh License: GPL Group: Applications/Publishing Source0: ftp://prep.ai.mit.edu:/pub/gnu/ghostscript-%{version}.tar.gz Source1: ftp://prep.ai.mit.edu:/pub/gnu/ghostscript-%{version}jpeg.tar.gz Source2: http://www.erdw.ethz.ch/~bonk/ftp/gs-driver-distrib/hp8xxs13.zip %define hpdjver 2.5 Source3: ftp://ftp.pdb.sni.de/pub/utilities/misc/hpdj-%{hpdjver}.tar.gz Patch0: ghostscript-5.10-config.patch Patch1: gs5.10-rth.patch Patch2: gs5.10-oki.patch Patch3:

OK, So just for fun I added the group "test" to /etc/group as GID 502: [[email protected] downloads]$ rpm2cpio NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-2960.src.rpm | cpio -tv -rw-rw-r-- 1 curt test 416410 May 14 11:26 NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-2960.tar.gz I don't anticipate that this will be too difficult, but unfortunately it's not as easy as downloading the commit as a patch and applying it - there have been far too Personal Open source Business Explore Sign up Sign in Pricing Blog Support Search GitHub This repository Watch 2 Star 2 Fork 2 sheepkiller/rbd-docker-plugin-rpm Code Issues 0 Pull requests 0 Projects It takes a few tries to set it up the first >time, but after that, it saves using root and possibly wrecking your OS or >fiddling with chroots.

To purr, feline" Thread view [Bacula-devel] Bacula.spec Logwatch issues From: Moray Henderson - 2010-01-26 12:54:00 More logwatch stuff, I'm afraid: You've got %if %{wb3} || %{rh7} || %{rh8} || %{rh9}