Home > Error Bad > Error Bad Owner/group Rpm

Error Bad Owner/group Rpm

J. You should really aim for a .spec in the tarball that works to build the rpms entirely from that tarball. To purr, feline" --- bacula.spec.orig 2010-01-25 02:56:28.000000000 -0500 +++ bacula.spec.1 2010-01-26 07:49:47.000000000 -0500 @@ -359,9 +359,9 @@ # distribution-specific directory for logwatch %if %{wb3} || %{rh7} || %{rh8} || %{rh9} || IMO it is much easier to use .rpmmacros to > >work in your home directory. useful reference

You signed out in another tab or window. I didn't think that was a fatal error. no difference.i've verified that the owner/group correspond to a valid account on thismachine, tried the build both as a regular user and as root, and so on,with no success.i'm naturally limited but i've tried variouscombinations -- i've unloaded the tarball, changed the owner and groupof the contents, and zipped it up again. you could check here

If you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please reply to the sender, so that proper delivery can be arranged, and please delete the message from your computer. Day 2004-01-15 17:36:12 UTC PermalinkRaw Message i *know* this has come up before, and i've already skimmed what googlefound for me.i have a cross-compile toolchain that i'm trying to use to We recommend upgrading to the latest Safari, Google Chrome, or Firefox.

Changes: - in opensuse build service, do not build mysql per default - removed gconsole, as it is not supported in V5 anymore - removed the patching of src/cats/make_sqlite3_tables.in, src/cats/create_sqlite3_database.in, src/cats/make_catalog_backup.in, Alternatively, use rpm2cpio and cpio to determine what the bad user or group is: [snip] [[email protected] downloads]$ rpm2cpio NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-2960.src.rpm | cpio -tv -rw-rw-r-- 1 curt 502 416410 May 14 11:26 NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-2960.tar.gz Attached properly now. Thank you.Inet Technologies, Inc.------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ram Prakash.

J. Also when copying from source to buildroot, you've > got the variable in the source path as well as the destination. > > Patch below should fix things. > > Moray. Terms Privacy Security Status Help You can't perform that action at this time. https://www.redhat.com/archives/rpm-list/2004-January/msg00090.html best regards, Philipp Am Freitag 29 Januar 2010 13:16:20 schrieb Moray Henderson: > >From: Kern Sibbald [mailto:[email protected]] > > > >> RPM build errors: > >> Bad owner/group: /builddir/build/SPECS/bacula.spec > >>

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] Re: "bad owner/group" on rpmbuild From: "Viktor Vislobokov" To: rpm-list redhat com Subject: Re: J. J. One problem I've been running into is that the uid and/or gids that own the spec files and source files won't always correspond to a user within the build environment.

It looks like you are working in some > >sort > >of chroot setup, which complicates everything -- you probably need to > >move /etc/passwd, ... https://sourceforge.net/p/bacula/mailman/message/24461171/ My apologies if I'm not using the right communications channels. error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/bacula/bacula_config /usr/lib/bacula/make_catalog_backup.pl RPM build errors: File listed twice: /etc/bacula/bacula-dir.conf File listed twice: /etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf File listed twice: /etc/bacula/bacula-sd.conf File listed twice: /etc/bacula/bconsole.conf File listed twice: /etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf I do the following:rpmtsCreate()rpmtsAddInstallElement () /* with the upgrade flag set to 1 */rpmtsCheck()rpmtsOrder()rpmtsRun()The rpmtsRun function fails saying the package is already installed.

No, thanks Skip to content Ignore Learn more Please note that GitHub no longer supports old versions of Firefox. see here I took the > freedom to use a slightly different approach falling back to the user > and group of the rpmbuild process and then to "root". > > Florian > J. Please don't fill out this field.

Your help and comments are appreciated. > > You should really aim for a .spec in the tarball that works to build the > rpms entirely from that tarball. Briefly describe the problem (required): Upload screenshot of ad (required): Select a file, or drag & drop file here. ✔ ✘ Please provide the ad click URL, if possible: Home Browse You find my diff attached. this page To purr, feline" > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation > Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best

This might be the issue, but in which case I am baffled, why would I need group 502 to build this? Unfortunately unless someone takes an interest in working on it, it is pretty unlikely to happen, because getting the spec files working correctly is always a considerable effort, and it is http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel > -- Philipp Storz [email protected]

Did all the files getunpacked?Eli--------------------. "If it ain't broke now,Eli Carter \ it will be soon." -- crypto-grameli.carter(a)inet.com `-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may containconfidential and/or privileged information that is intended

Thanks. For example: chown root.root blahblah.src.rpm With best wishes, Victor Vislobokov Perm, Russia Follow-Ups: Re: "bad owner/group" on rpmbuild From: Toralf Lund References: "bad owner/group" on rpmbuild From: Toralf Lund Tracked down that error: the .spec from the tarball is extracted as owner/group 1000, which doesn't exist in my build system. [email protected] Discussion: "Error: Bad owner/group" while rebuilding src rpm (too old to reply) Robert P.

I'll have a look when I can, but I'm about to start a major OS upgrade on a main production server, so I'll be a bit busy for a while... My rpmbuild command still fails with mock-chroot> rpmbuild -D 'build_centos5 1' -D 'build_sqlite 1' -ba bacula.spec ... Thanks very much! http://axishost.net/error-bad/error-bad-owner-group-usr-src-redhat-specs.php If you are not theintended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this e-mailmessage is strictly prohibited.

True from my end too - which is why the patch was in the message body rather than a real attachment ;-) >What you show below looks good to me. > If you are not theintended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,copying, distribution or reliance upon the contents of this e-mailmessage is strictly prohibited. Please don't fill out this field. Day 2004-01-15 20:09:23 UTC PermalinkRaw Message -----Original Message-----From: Eli Carter <***@inet.com>Sent: Jan 15, 2004 2:56 PMTo: rpm-***@redhat.comSubject: Re: "Error: Bad owner/group" while rebuilding src rpmPost by Robert P.

It takes a few tries to set it up the first > >time, but after that, it saves using root and possibly wrecking your OS or > >fiddling with chroots. > R***************************************************************************This message is proprietary to Future Software Limited (FSL)and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom itis addressed.