Home > Error And > Error And Exception Handling With Assertions In .net

Error And Exception Handling With Assertions In .net

When developing an API so people could access Crivo (my product), the first thing that you should do is calling the Login method. Trying to understand what a CustomerID is doing on the ProductID column on the InvoiceItems table after a few months isn't fun neither easy. Most of the solutions I write are for the financial market, focused on credit systems. Don't ever swallow exceptions The worst thing you can do is catch (Exception) and put an empty code block on it. my review here

Isn't that more expensive than an elevated system? Similarly, if a user tries to open a file that does not exist, you can first call the File.Exists method to check whether the file exists and, if it does not, The Exception class is the base class of all exceptions in the .NET Framework. This will keep your stack trace intact, but still allows you to put code in your catch blocks. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/933613/how-do-i-use-assert-to-verify-that-an-exception-has-been-thrown

See stackoverflow.com/a/25084462/2166177 –steve Aug 1 '14 at 16:28 FYI - I've moved onto using xUnit which has a strongly-typed Assert.Throws method that covers both of these cases. –tvanfosson Jun share|improve this answer edited Aug 1 '14 at 16:44 answered Aug 1 '14 at 16:14 steve 350312 add a comment| up vote 4 down vote The helper provided by @Richiban above After all this research, I could not decide yet whether shallow class hierarchies are a good idea in Exception handling or not, so I decided to leave both opinions here.

No matter what happens, you need to delete this file, because it's temporary. ref: msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/… –shahkalpesh Jun 1 '09 at 5:10 2 Funny, I just finished looking for the answer to this, found it at stackoverflow.com/questions/741029/testing-exceptions. –dfjacobs Jun 1 '09 at 5:12 We can't test directly that an exception is thrown. So in summary, this approach sports: ease-of-use, flexibility and robustness (hard to do it wrong).

Think of them as "safety nets", and log the exception for further examination. Expected=\"" + expectedExceptionMessage + "\", got \"" + ex.Message + "\""); } } ///

/// Asserts that calling a method does not throw an exception. /// /// /// asked 7 years ago viewed 62337 times active 6 days ago Linked 481 How do I use Assert to verify that an exception has been thrown? 11 How to prevent expected If Login fails, or is not called, every other method call will fail.

The using keyword will prevent resource leaks even on the presence of an exception. For beginners, the temptation of using global variables will be huge. You may never know how much code you'll break by doing it. But I suppose you could image throws to mean: thrown and not caught.

Yes No Additional feedback? 1500 characters remaining Submit Skip this Thank you! http://www.nunit.org/index.php?p=exceptionAsserts&r=2.5.10 It's not that the user will be thrilled by the marvelous dialog box you'll show him. They're over at http://exceptionless.com Sign In·ViewThread·Permalink My vote of 5 Sibeesh Venu3-Aug-14 4:45 Sibeesh Venu3-Aug-14 4:45 My Vote Of 5 Sign In·ViewThread·Permalink Now I finally understand Finally Nutster21-Jan-14 5:04 Writes can fail, too Unreliable data sources are also unreliable data repositories.

The application will finish if the exception occurred on the main thread (actually, any thread that started from unmanaged code). this page This solution give you specific control to do a more correct test, plus you can to a test Writeline to your test run report, that the exception was indeed thrown as Home | Blog | Tutorials | About | RSS © 2016 Bradley Braithwaite 12,526,142 members (45,625 online) Sign in Email Password Forgot your password? PlatformNotSupportedExceptionThe operation is not supported on the current platform.

This logic needs to be farmed out to a well-designed assert method. Tripathi2-Dec-14 21:30 good Sign In·ViewThread·Permalink Saudacões do Brasil! c# unit-testing assert vs-unit-testing-framework test-class share|improve this question edited Oct 16 '13 at 10:56 Chau 3,54654470 asked Jun 1 '09 at 5:01 Alex 25.9k56201304 Which unit testing framework are get redirected here Person p = (Person) obj; return this.Name.Equals(p.Name); } } public class Example { public static void Main() { Person p1 = new Person(); p1.Name = "John"; Person p2 = null; //

Don't put important exception information on the Message field Exceptions are classes. I bet that the guy who wrote it will kill me when he read this, but it was taken from a real-world example. I chose to throw an exception from the Login method if it fails, instead of simply returning false, so the calling program cannot ignore it.

kiquenet.com Sign In·ViewThread·Permalink How does .NET know which error to throw?

The reason I didn't change the article immediately was because I needed to do more research before I introduced it here. The outer exception is thrown in response to this inner exception. catch (AssertionException) { throw; } You should be able to adapt this approach to whatever you like -- including specifying what kinds of exceptions to catch. You can achieve better code and you won't have to pick between the different techniques or change from one to another as the test changes.

FINAL THOUGHT Before switching to this sort of approach I considered using the ExpectedException attribute when a test only verified the exception type and using a try/catch block if more validation He writes about software development practices, JavaScript, AngularJS and Node.js via his website bradoncode.com. The second problem is that the syntax is the same (or similar) but the behavior is different between different unit testing frameworks. http://axishost.net/error-and/error-and-exception-handling-in-asp-net.php I'd love to hear your opinion and suggestions about this topic.

History 9 Feb 2005 - Initial version 21 Feb 2005 - Added information about ApplicationException, AppDomain.UnhandledException and Application.ThreadException License This article, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed There can be one or more catch blocks, each designed to handle a particular type of exception, or one block designed to catch a more specific exception than another block.If an Error-Handling RoutinesRoutineUse.NET Framework equivalentassert macroTest for programming logic errors; available in both the release and debug versions of the run-time librarySystem::Diagnostics::Debug::Assert_ASSERT, _ASSERTE macrosSimilar to assert, but only available in the debug It's also much more readable. –David Sherret Sep 7 '14 at 4:21 1 @gt - see other comments in this thread.

I prefer this style since all the actions and assertions are now within the body of the test. [TestMethod] public void AddWithNegativeNumberThrowsException() { // Starting with the .NET Framework 4.5.1 and Windows 8.1, the common language runtime continues to use the original Exception object that was thrown unless that exception was modified in a non-.NET K. For example, the ArgumentException class includes a ParamName property that specifies the name of the parameter whose argument caused the exception, and the RegexMatchTimeoutException property includes a MatchTimeout property that indicates